posté le 06-09-2008 à 14:55:15
For what it worth...
For what it worth, I don't play the strategy I have mentionned some few posts ago, because my opponents steal to many pots from me. I just min raise most of my buttons and cbet most of the flops, in order to win the pots when noone has nothing. Why I min raise is because I wanna play small pots, playing with my image. This way I can try moves without losing one third of my stack and see how villain is reacting, It's a good compromise beteween the well known "raise 3x" strategy and the "limp" strategy. OOP I play standard : tight
Commentaires
Je ne sais plus si je t'en avais parlé, mais c'est l'approche de Daniel Negreanu, il en parle dans cet article sur son blog : http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poker-journal.php?subaction=showfull&id=1203305313&archive=&start_from=&ucat=&
Cf la fin :
"Ideally you want to be the aggressor heads up, but if your opponent pushes the envelope to the point where they are uber-aggressive, you can actually beat them by sitting back a little bit and playing a more solid game- hoping they'll make a big mistake.
My approach is pretty simple. I min raise on the button a high percentage of the time and I rarely re-raise from the big blind. On the flop, I bet 50% of the pot a high percentage of the time. There is one other strategy adjustment that I do make, but it's not something I can share as it gives away too much info.
I can understand why people make it 3x on the button, but I think it's a mistake against most good players. I think 2x on the button is more profitable heads up. At the NBC Heads Up this year, I'll be making it 2x until the blinds get up there and I'm forced to either limp or push."
A noter que c'est aussi comme ça que joue Rémiou!